The History and Philosophy of Circumcision Along With A Few Facts

Posted on June 20th, 2024


The practice of circumcision involves looking back at some of humanity's earliest civilizations. The Egyptians are often seen as the pioneers of this practice, blending hygiene and ritual.

As you learn more about the history of this practice you'll find that ancient Israelites embraced circumcision, intertwining it with spiritual symbolism that persists in Jewish traditions today.

Contrarily, not all ancient cultures shared this view; Greeks and Romans often shunned the practice, demonstrating its varied acceptance.


Ancient Origins and Symbolism

Circumcision history traces back to some of the earliest known civilizations.

The ancient Egyptians are often credited with the origins of circumcision, with evidence dating back to around 2400 BCE. In several early Egyptian tomb paintings and carvings, we see depictions of the procedure, suggesting it was practiced for both hygienic and ritualistic purposes.

Circumcision spread to other cultures in the ancient Near East, including the Israelites. The Hebrew Bible recounts its introduction as part of a covenant between God and Abraham, making it not just a physical act but a profound spiritual commitment. It was viewed as a rite of passage and a tangible symbol of belonging to the community and faith.

Meanwhile, in other ancient cultures such as the Greeks and Romans, circumcision was less commonly practiced and sometimes actively avoided, highlighting its diverse acceptance and varying significance across different societies. As you study these origins, you'll see that circumcision symbolized more than just an alteration; it represented a interesting interplay between identity, spirituality, and societal norms.


Ritual and Religious Practices

  • Ritual circumcision is a big part of Judaism, Islam, and the early Christian church, each with distinct rituals and religious significance.
  • In Judaism, religious circumcision is performed on the eighth day of a boy's life during the Brit Milah ceremony. This rite is deeply rooted in the covenant between God and Abraham, signifying the boy's entry into a sacred communal bond. It is an event that brings family and community members together in celebration and prayer. The Mohel, a specialist in this ritual, performs the circumcision while prayers and blessings are recited. The ceremony is imbued with profound religious meaning, linking the individual directly to his heritage, history, and faith. Beyond the physical act, it is a moment of spiritual initiation and collective affirmation of Jewish identity and continuity.
  • In Islam, circumcision, known as khitan, is regarded as a religious circumcision and a vital practice rooted in the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad. While there are no specific age requirements, it often takes place before puberty. In some cultures, it is performed at a very young age, sometimes even on the seventh day of life, similar to Jewish practices. The procedure is seen as an act of purification and a commitment to Islamic principles. Families typically hold gatherings to mark the occasion, celebrating the young boy's integration into the religious community.
  • In Christianity, early Christian communities showed diverse attitudes toward circumcision. Initially stemming from Jewish traditions, early Christians debated its necessity. The Apostle Paul significantly influenced this discourse, advocating that faith in Christ made physical circumcision unnecessary for Gentile converts. Consequently, while early Judeo-Christians practiced it, most mainstream Christian denominations today do not require circumcision as a religious mandate. This shift highlights the evolving theological perspectives within Christianity, emphasizing faith and spiritual transformation over physical rituals.


Medical Perspectives and Historical Context in the U.S.

The lens of medical circumcision in the United States offers a fascinating narrative that intertwines with shifts in societal beliefs about health, hygiene, and morality.

The history of circumcision in the United States dates back to the late 19th century, a period when circumcision first began to gain medical traction. It was during this time that the procedure was promoted by medical professionals who believed it held various health benefits, including the prevention of conditions like phimosis, balanitis, and even masturbation, which was then widely viewed as a moral deficiency.

Hints of the moral undertones shaping medical opinion were reflected in the broader cultural movement of the time that emphasized 'moral hygiene.' By the early 20th century, circumcision became increasingly common in American hospitals, especially for newborn boys.

The practice reached a pivotal moment in the 1940s when World War II's medical protocols, advocating for circumcised soldiers to reduce the risk of infections and sexually transmitted diseases, further solidified its acceptance. This trend continued to gather momentum, and circumcision rates climbed significantly during the post-war baby boom of the 1950s and 1960s. During these decades, circumcision was almost routinely performed in hospitals, with the majority of newborn boys undergoing the procedure as part of standard postnatal care.

Further in the 1970s and beyond, the narrative around medical circumcision began to shift as part of a broader reevaluation of medical practices and bodily autonomy. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and other medical organizations began to scrutinize the necessity and benefits of routine circumcision more rigorously.

In the 1980s, AAP's stance gradually evolved, highlighting that while there could be medical benefits, these were not significant enough to warrant routine circumcision for all newborn males as a blanket policy.

Then, in their 2012 statement, the AAP acknowledged that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweighed the risks, though they did not go as far as to recommend it universally, emphasizing parental choice in making an informed decision. Amid this background, it's noteworthy that public opinion and circumcision rates have varied over the decades influenced by ongoing discussions around medical ethics, cultural practices, and personal freedoms. 


Modern Trends and Practices

Modern circumcision trends in the US and globally reflect an interplay of cultural, medical, and social influences.

Currently, circumcision rates in the U.S. have seen some fluctuations, with about 55-60% of newborn males undergoing the procedure, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This rate has decreased from the higher percentages observed in the mid-20th century.

Globally, the prevalence of circumcision varies widely, with estimates suggesting that around 30% of males worldwide are circumcised. In many Muslim-majority countries and Israel, circumcision is nearly universal due to religious mandates. In contrast, European nations have significantly lower circumcision rates, often below 20%, reflecting differing cultural norms and medical practices. This divergence illustrates how regional and cultural contexts shape the acceptance and prevalence of circumcision.

When considering the most common circumcision methods, the Gomco clamp, Mogen clamp, and Plastibell device are frequently used in medical settings. These methods are designed to ensure safety and efficiency, with the Gomco clamp being one of the most widely adopted in the U.S. due to its precision and relatively quick procedure time. Yet, there's been a noticeable shift towards using the Plastibell device, especially for neonatal circumcision, as it minimizes the need for sutures and typically results in less postoperative care. Public opinion and medical recommendations have also evolved, influenced by ethical considerations and emerging research.

While certain medical benefits, such as reduced risks of urinary tract infections and some sexually transmitted infections, are acknowledged, the emphasis has shifted towards parental choice and informed consent. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) maintains a neutral stance, advocating for parents to weigh the medical benefits against potential risks and to make decisions based on their cultural, religious, and personal values. This nuanced approach underscores the importance of respecting individual autonomy and cultural diversity in the practice of circumcision.


Cultural and Philosophical Perspectives

From a cultural and philosophical standpoint, circumcision has been a nuanced and widespread practice throughout history.

In various societies, it represented not only a physical alteration but also a significant cultural and spiritual emblem.

For ancient Egyptians, circumcision history indicates it was likely a rite of purification and a marker of social status. It depicted a form of ritualistic cleansing and possibly distinguished individuals within higher societal ranks.

For the Israelites, circumcision symbolized a covenant with God, a sacred bond marking one's entry into the Jewish community. This act was deeply integrated into Jewish identity, especially through centuries of diaspora.

Among some African tribes, circumcision is a rite of passage into manhood, emphasizing maturity, courage, and preparedness for adult responsibilities.

These diverse interpretations highlight how the procedure was more than just a physical act; it was about belonging, spirituality, and adherence to societal norms.

In contemporary discussions, circumcision often sparks various ethical and cultural debates, reflecting its complex significance. Some argue from a health perspective, advocating the medical benefits such as reduced risks of urinary tract infections and certain sexually transmitted infections.

However, others emphasize bodily autonomy, questioning whether a non-consensual procedure should be performed on infants. This tension between medical advantages and ethical considerations is central to many discussions today. Additionally, cultural and religious beliefs play a significant role in perpetuating the practice. In Muslim-majority nations, for example, circumcision is almost universal due to religious mandates, symbolizing purity and faithfulness to Islamic traditions.

On the other hand, many European countries see lower circumcision rates, often below 20%, as cultural norms and medical guidelines there do not emphasize the practice. Whether it's viewed through the lens of cultural identity, medical ethics, or personal choice, learning about the rich historical and philosophical context of circumcision allows for a more informed and compassionate discussion around this longstanding practice.



Circumcision, spanning millennia and continents, remains a deeply ingrained practice with significant cultural, religious, and medical implications. From its ancient origins in Egyptian and Israelite civilizations to its modern-day interpretations and controversies, circumcision reflects a complex interplay of tradition, identity, and health. Across different cultures, it has symbolized purity, community belonging, and spiritual commitment, while also evolving in response to medical understandings and ethical debates.

As attitudes and understandings continue to evolve, the conversation around circumcision underscores the importance of respecting individual choices, cultural diversity, and informed decision-making. Whether viewed through a historical lens or contemporary debates, circumcision remains a poignant example of how ancient traditions intersect with modern practices in a globalized world.

So, when you're considering circumcision for your newborn, it's beneficial to reflect on the rich tapestry of history and cultural significance that underpins this practice. Whether it's for spiritual reasons, cultural traditions, or perceived health benefits, choosing to circumcise is a deeply personal decision.

At Seattle Bris and Circumcision, we understand and respect these complexities. Our dedicated in-clinic services provide a compassionate and experienced approach, ensuring that your child receives the highest standard of care.

Learn more about Newborn Circumcision (In Clinic) services, call us at (206) 657-6394, or email [email protected] for any questions or to schedule an appointment.

Get In Touch

Contact me!

Please call me at 856-291-1873 to discuss any questions you may have, or to schedule a Bris or Circumcision.